In this article is an intro to behavioural philosophy in the context of online activities.
Throughout the years, the internet has basically changed the way people are communicating, sharing and accessing information. As more of our daily lives move online, it has ended up being progressively crucial to comprehend why individuals act differently on the internet compared to in real-life contexts and discuss the rules for proper online behaviour. The online disinhibition effect is a theory that explores how digital environments can alter specific behaviour through the mask of privacy that comes with being behind a screen. This theory describes why people may act in different ways online than they would in direct conversations. Key aspects adding to this result include anonymity, invisibility and the isolated nature of most online platforms. This can lead people to express undesirable things or overshare information that they would not share in real life because they do not perceive any instant consequences or psychological feedback from others. While this disinhibition can result in distasteful interactions, it can also have positive results such as encouraging people to share vulnerable stories and look for support in online communities.
For browsing modern-day digital environments, scientists have established a variety of ideas to explain the different sort of behaviours seen on modern online platforms. The social identity design of deindividuation results offers a sophisticated view on how privacy impacts online group behaviour. Contrary to the presumption that privacy results in negative online behaviours, this theory suggests that anonymous individuals are most likely to conform to the standards of groups they relate to. It is thought that online platforms are magnifying this impact by motivating users to construct online communities based on shared interests and ideologies. Redscan would recognise that this design highlights how social identity influences behaviour online, particularly in group settings. It also helps to explain positive online behaviour examples, such as co-operation in problem solving, in addition to unfavorable group behaviours and the reinforcement of beliefs.
As the world transitions to a more globalised digital community, attentions towards what constitutes responsible online behaviour has gained traction by researchers, authorities and a number of here organisations. Over the last few years, a variety of empirical theories have been established to describe the behaviours of netizens and social media users. Uses and gratifications theory turns the focus from how media impacts users to how users are actively deciding to spend time online to gratify their own pursuits. This can be for objectives such as getting information, home entertainment and communicating online. Moreover, this theory recognises the agency of users in forming their own digital experiences, by suggesting that behaviours on the internet are driven by a function, rather than passively experienced. Digitalis would acknowledge the impacts of user behaviours online in constructing digital spaces. Likewise, Sprint Infinity would concur that studying online behaviours has been significant for making sense of digital communities.